Part 1 consists of an oral presentation of two publications or two papers presented to publication standards based on both academic and clinical activities subsequent to two consecutive years of advanced training in an M.Sc. or Ph.D. degree program acceptable to the College. This element of the Examination will be based on the spirit and format of a Ph.D. defence.
Part 2 of the Examination will target a group of subjects in which the candidate has demonstrated expertise. This part may be completely oral or a combination of oral and written elements. The suggested groups of categories are as outlined below. The subject area, however, may be re-grouped to reflect a specific candidate’s interests. The intent is for the candidate to demonstrate a range of knowledge in the chosen area of expertise.
4. Preventive Dentistry
Try to relax and listen carefully to the questions.
Notepads and pens will be available for note taking. All notes must be left in the Examination room at the end of the Examination.
When asked to describe something, do not skip to the obvious conclusion and ignore other important details. The examiners are interested in observing the process used by the candidate to critically assess the item. Do not stare at an image quietly; candidates should verbalize their thought processes and describe what they see.
The Examination cases have been selected to be representative of the skills and knowledge a qualified specialist with appropriate training should be able to personally manage. Whether candidates treat a particular type of patient in their practice or provide a particular procedure in their office is irrelevant.
Candidates should handle each case as though it were a patient presenting to his/her office, and answer the questions as if he/she was personally treating the patients in his/her practice.
Candidates may ask to have questions repeated and to see images again if needed. Candidates may also ask to see additional images. Once a case is completed and the Examination has progressed to the next case, candidates cannot answer questions on previous cases.
All the case material must be covered during the allotted time period. Answer the questions in a succinct and organized manner. Candidates that stall or ramble will be refocused to the original question by the examiners.
The examiners remain impartial and have been trained not to give candidates any indication whether their responses are correct or incorrect. This behaviour may appear unfriendly to some candidates, but it is essential to ensure that no candidates receive helpful positive reinforcement from examiners.
Do not argue or debate with the examiners in an attempt to elicit information or the correct response. If there are legitimate differences of opinion on how to treat a case within a specialty, select the mainstream option and then mention possible alternative approaches.
Remember that there are never any trick questions.